Daily PulseNews

Supreme Court Upholds Trump Administration's Authority to Terminate Temporary Protected Status

An immigration attorney warns of severe consequences for vulnerable Americans and the economy following the high court's decision regarding TPS for Haitian and Syrian nationals.

June 26, 2026 · Media

Supreme Court Upholds Trump Administration's Authority to Terminate Temporary Protected Status

Immigration attorney Allen Orr has voiced strong criticism against the Supreme Court's recent decision, which affirmed the Trump administration's authority to terminate Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for individuals from Haiti and Syria. Orr asserted that this ruling would lead to widespread suffering and loss of life.

The high court delivered a 6-3 decision on Thursday in the case identified as Mullin v. Doe. The ruling determined that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), during President Donald Trump's tenure, acted within its legal bounds when moving to rescind temporary protections previously extended to nationals of specific countries, thereby reversing earlier judgments made by lower courts.

Court Upholds Executive Authority on TPS

Appearing on "MS NOW Reports," Orr, who served as legal counsel for Haitian nationals involved in the case, characterized the decision as "very devastating" for the American populace. He further suggested that the ramifications could be fatal for many.

Orr elaborated on the potential fallout, stating,

"There are going to be a lot of jobs that are left open, and a lot of people in the home healthcare industry who are not going to receive any service, because their providers are going to be removed from the United States. There are a lot of people who are going to die and suffer because of this. So I wish this court was more of a court of equity rather than what they say they were a court of policy right now."

Attorney Warns of Dire Consequences

He also expressed his disapproval of the Supreme Court for disregarding President Trump's previous remarks concerning Haitian migrants within their ruling. Furthermore, Orr challenged the repeated assertion that the protection status was inherently "temporary" merely due to its nomenclature.

Orr commented,

"The concept that people keep repeating — that the problem is its 'temporary' status, and it’s been longer than temporary — well, change the word. Don’t put people’s lives in danger because you feel that label arbitrarily moves something."

He further emphasized the role of TPS holders in the nation, stating,

"As I said before, there are a million-plus TPS individuals who are here legally, working. They’re authorized, they’ve been vetted. There are none of the other concerns you might have with people who come in undocumented. They’re supporting our economy. And when you remove those individuals, you draw down all of those work areas. All those jobs they’re doing, all of these companies that were relying on these TPS workers to work tomorrow are going to have to make decisions about them leaving today."

Administration Defends "Temporary" Nature

In response to the ruling, a statement attributed to Jackson conveyed,

"Today, the Supreme Court affirmed what President Trump has always maintained: temporary protected status is, by definition, temporary. It was never intended to be a pathway to permanent status or legal residency and it is committed to the discretion of the Secretary of Homeland Security. The Trump Administration continues to lawfully end the egregious abuses to our immigration system that have hurt Americans for years."

President Trump first moved to revoke TPS for Haitians in 2017, a designation originally granted after the devastating 2010 earthquake. While federal challenges kept Haitian TPS active throughout his initial term, the original reporting indicates that in 2025, then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem ended the status entirely.

In his written opinion, Justice Samuel Alito noted that a racial motive for the policy alteration would likely be difficult to establish. He reasoned that the respondents themselves had put forth the possibility that the Trump administration's opposition to TPS was a matter of broader policy, rather than targeting any specific ethnic group.

Supreme CourtTemporary Protected StatusTPSimmigrationTrump administrationHaitian nationalsSyrian nationalsAllen OrrMullin v. Doehome healthcare