New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani encountered difficulty articulating a precise definition for the "working class" during a recent interview with the New York Times.
New York Times journalist Lulu Garcia-Navarro questioned Mamdani, a member of the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), about his and his organization's criteria for defining the working class, a group they frequently advocate for in political campaigns.
Defining the 'Working Class'
Mamdani initially suggested a broad interpretation, stating, "I think if you have to work to pay your bills, I think that that is one definition of being a part of the working class."
Garcia-Navarro pressed him on this point, asking for clarification: "So someone making $250,000 a year is working class?"
The Mayor responded by acknowledging he hadn't "sat at home and asked myself where it starts and stops." He then elaborated on his perspective:
What I would say is those who are working to try and afford the basic dignities of life and aren’t able to do so, I think that that is also working class. Oftentimes we’re asked how we divide this country. I think there’s only one majority in this country — it’s the working class.
Garcia-Navarro expressed skepticism, noting that this definition, which could encompass anyone earning a salary, "didn't ring true" to her. She asked if he would draw any specific income boundaries.
Mamdani then indicated a different threshold, suggesting he would draw the line at "about a million dollars a year."
"So anyone under a million dollars a year in income is working class?" Garcia-Navarro clarified.
Mamdani quickly refined his position, explaining:
That’s not what I’m saying. I’m just saying, in terms of fiscal policy, I think a lot of our politics has been a debate over who you leave out. And I’m more interested in debates of how you bring more in. And I think that that is part of what I'm looking to be a part of is a vision where people understand no matter what you call it that there's room for them. But yes, I do want to raise taxes on people who make more than a million a year.
The journalist then highlighted a potential inconsistency, pointing out that his definition might group a janitor and a lawyer under the same "working class" designation, questioning its accuracy. Mamdani appeared to shift the focus toward the general aspirations of New Yorkers.
A Vision for New Yorkers
He reflected on his campaign experience, stating:
When I was running, a question I would face was: What does it mean to be a democratic socialist? And I only bring that up because I think sometimes there’s a fixation on a definition of something. And what I found is, when I would knock on New Yorkers’ doors, they would just ask, 'Am I part of your vision?' It’s not that everyone is making the same amount of money or facing the same amount of struggle, but that they just want to know, is there any way for them to actually be able to work this hard and afford a good life in the city?
Comments on International Affairs
The interview also gained attention for Mamdani's remarks regarding Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Mamdani disclosed that his administration is engaged in "active conversation" with the city’s Law Department to explore potential legal actions the city could pursue against Netanyahu if he attends the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in New York this September.
In the discussion, Mamdani characterized Netanyahu as a "war criminal" who "belongs in The Hague," reaffirming his intention to respect an International Criminal Court arrest warrant for the Israeli leader.
